• Log In
  • New issue alert
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Register
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Search
  • Archives
  • Current
  • Forthcoming

Share

Article Panel


Vol 18, No 2 (2015)
»Table of Contents
Reading Tools
  • About the author
  • How to cite this article
  • Indexing metadata
  • Print version
  • Look up terms
  • Finding References
  • Review policy

Related items
  • Author's work


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International.
DNA from tissues of young mice is optimal for genotyping | Picazo | Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.12.002
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, Vol 18, No 2 (2015)

DNA from tissues of young mice is optimal for genotyping

María G Picazo, Dolores C García-Olmo



Abstract

Background: Genotyping of mice is a common procedure in animal facilities. The aim of this study was to compare the quantity and quality of DNA extracted from samples obtained from young mice (YM; 10 d old) and adult mice (AM; 12 weeks old). We collected samples from the tail and ear of YM and AM. We also sampled blood, check cells (via buccal swabs), hair and fecal pellets of AM, and biopsied distal phalanx of YM. We isolated DNA using commercial kits and determined concentrations and purity by spectrophotometry. The integrity of DNA was evaluated by agarose-gel electrophoresis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results: DNA in all samples was amplified successfully but the intensities of bands after electrophoresis was heterogeneous. In general, tissues from YM yielded more DNA than those from AM, with differences being statistically significant for ear samples (38 ± 12 ng/μL for YM; 7 ± 3 ng/μL for AM; P = 0.006). In YM, the most DNA was obtained from ear and tail samples, with differences from the amounts obtained from phalanx samples being statistically significant (P = 0.02 and P = 0.005, respectively). In AM, the most DNA was obtained from tail and blood samples. Samples obtained by non-invasive sampling methods in adults resulted in a deficient DNA extraction.

Conclusions: The results of the present study do not support the previous recommendations for using non-invasive methods to genotype adult animals. The use of newborn tissue samples showed the highest efficiency for DNA extraction.



Full Text: | Reprint PDF | HTML

ISSN:  0717-3458

Contact: edbiotec@pucv.cl

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Av. Brasil 2950, Valparaíso, Chile
Copyright © 1997- 2023 by Electronic Journal of Biotechnology